Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M6000 vs AMD Radeon R9 M365X

AMD FirePro M6000 vs AMD Radeon R9 M365X

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M6000 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M365X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M365X 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (72.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M6000
1.024 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M365X +15%
1.184 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2012
Release Date
May 2015
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
640
40
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.80 GPixel/s
32.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1024 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1184 GFLOPS
64.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Heathrow
GPU Name
Tropo
Heathrow XT GL (216-0835033)
GPU Variant
Tropo XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy