Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M6000 vs AMD Radeon RX 7900M

AMD FirePro M6000 vs AMD Radeon RX 7900M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M6000 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 7900M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M6000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 180W)
AMD Radeon RX 7900M 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2090MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3968 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M6000
1.024 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7900M +3661%
38.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2012
Release Date
Oct 2023
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Navi Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2090 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
72
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
4608
40
TMUs
288
16
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
72
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

12.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
401.3 GPixel/s
32.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
601.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
77.05 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
38.52 TFLOPS
64.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1204 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
180W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Heathrow
GPU Name
Navi 31
Heathrow XT GL (216-0835033)
GPU Variant
Navi 31
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy