Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M7740 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

AMD FirePro M7740 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M7740 and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 54.14GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 60W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M7740
0.832 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +974%
8.94 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2009
Release Date
Mar 2023
FirePro Mobility
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
846 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
54.14GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
640
Shading Units
3072
32
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
69.84 GPixel/s
20.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
139.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.940 TFLOPS
832.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.940 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
139.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

M97
GPU Name
AD107
M97XT-GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.826 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
137 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy