Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD FirePro M5800

AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD FirePro M5800

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M5800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
560 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M5800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (26W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900 +151%
1.306 TFLOPS
FirePro M5800
0.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Mar 2010
FirePro Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobility
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
5
960
Shading Units
400
48
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
Madison
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
Madison XT GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
26W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy