Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M

AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900 +580%
1.306 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 160M
0.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Mar 2009
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 100M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
960
Shading Units
64
48
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
G94
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
N10E-GS1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy