Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150

AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1532MHz
Lower TDP (25W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900 +10%
1.306 TFLOPS
GeForce MX150
1.177 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
May 2017
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1469 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1532 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
960
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.51 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.77 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.38 GFLOPS
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1177 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
36.77 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
GP108
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
GP108-650-A1 (N17S-G1-A1)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy