AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1057MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
+231%
4.329 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2011
Release Date
May 2021
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 30 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
712 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1057 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
960
Shading Units
2048
48
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.82 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.65 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.329 TFLOPS
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.329 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.65 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Blackcomb
GPU Name
GA107
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
212 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
