Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD Radeon HD 6750M Mac Edition

AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD Radeon HD 6750M Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 6750M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 50.82GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 6750M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900 +127%
1.306 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6750M Mac Edition
0.574 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Apr 2011
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Vancouver
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
794 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
50.82GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
6
960
Shading Units
480
48
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.784 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.35 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
574.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
Whistler
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
Whistler PRO (216-0810005)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
35W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy