Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD Radeon Pro 460

AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD Radeon Pro 460

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 460 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 81.28GB/s)
AMD Radeon Pro 460 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock907MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 460 +42%
1.858 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Oct 2016
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
850 MHz
-
Boost Clock
907 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
81.28GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
960
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.51 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.05 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.858 TFLOPS
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.858 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
116.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
Baffin
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
Baffin XT
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
3 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy