AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
8768 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
+2403%
32.69 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2011
Release Date
Mar 2023
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
76
960
Shading Units
9728
48
TMUs
304
32
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
150W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Blackcomb
GPU Name
AD103
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.8
