Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro R5000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand

AMD FirePro R5000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro R5000 and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Boost Clock888MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro R5000
1.267 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand +61%
2.046 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2013
Release Date
Aug 2013
FirePro Remote
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
823 MHz
-
Boost Clock
888 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1152
48
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.31 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.25 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.046 TFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
85.25 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
130W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GK104
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
GK104-200-KD-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy