Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1752 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB +10540%
3.405 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Jan 2009
FirePro
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
2
1792
Shading Units
40
112
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV620
Orthrus
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Board Design

375W
TDP
32W
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x VHDCI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy