Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs AMD FirePro W4300

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs AMD FirePro W4300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB and 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Lower TDP (50W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB +138%
3.405 TFLOPS
FirePro W4300
1.428 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Dec 2015
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
768
112
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1428 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.28 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
50W
750 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Bonaire
Orthrus
GPU Variant
Bonaire PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy