Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs NVIDIA P106 100

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs NVIDIA P106 100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB and 6GB VRAM P106 100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 192.2GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA P106 100 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 80% (1709MHz vs 950MHz)
Lower TDP (120W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB
3.405 TFLOPS
P106 100 +28%
4.375 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Jun 2017
FirePro
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
1506 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
1709 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2002 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.2GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
10
1792
Shading Units
1280
112
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
82.03 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
136.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
68.36 GFLOPS
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.375 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
136.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
120W
750 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GP106
Orthrus
GPU Variant
GP106-100-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy