Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB and 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
May 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
-
112
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

375W
TDP
Unknown
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV560
Orthrus
GPU Variant
RV560 GT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.312 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
230 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy