Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Boost Clock950MHz
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (300W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive
3.405 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2 +134%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Mar 2016
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
4096
112
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
300W
750 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Capsaicin
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy