Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs ATI FirePro V8800

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs ATI FirePro V8800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (208W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive +28%
3.405 TFLOPS
FirePro V8800
2.64 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Apr 2010
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
20
1792
Shading Units
1600
112
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Cypress
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Board Design

375W
TDP
208W
750 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy