Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD FireStream 9370

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD FireStream 9370

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (225W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive +28%
3.405 TFLOPS
FireStream 9370
2.64 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Jun 2010
FirePro
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
1600
112
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
225W
750 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Cypress
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy