Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
1776 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive +8630%
3.405 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Apr 2007
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
1792
Shading Units
16
112
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

375W
TDP
40W
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GT218
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy