Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 384MB VRAM GeForce 9600 GSO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 384GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
1696 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (84W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive +1189%
3.405 TFLOPS
GeForce 9600 GSO
0.264 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Apr 2008
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
384MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
1792
Shading Units
96
112
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
48 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
264.0 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

375W
TDP
84W
750 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
G92
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy