Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 430 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1696 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive +1165%
3.405 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 430
0.269 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Oct 2010
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
1792
Shading Units
96
112
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
49W
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GF108
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
GF108-300-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy