Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs MTT S80

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs MTT S80

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 16GB VRAM MTT S80 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Boost Clock950MHz
MTT S80 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (255W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive
3.405 TFLOPS
MTT S80 +322%
14.4 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Oct 2023
FirePro
Generation
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
1800 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
0 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1792
Shading Units
4096
112
TMUs
32
ROPs
-
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
768 KB
L2 Cache
0 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
TFLOPS
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.4 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
255W
750 W
Suggested PSU
350 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
CPU 8Pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
ChunXiao
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
GCN 1.0
Architecture
MUSA
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
22 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.1
Shader Model

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy