Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 OEM

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 1280MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1280GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 128.3GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive +301%
3.405 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 560 OEM
0.848 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Nov 2011
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
1280MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
320bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.3GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
1792
Shading Units
384
112
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
640 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.25 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.50 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
847.9 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
106.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
150W
750 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GF110
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
GF110-040-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
3 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy