Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 GM206 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 30% (1239MHz vs 950MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive +168%
3.405 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 750 GM206
1.269 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Nov 2015
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
1087 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
1239 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
512
112
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.65 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.65 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1269 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
39.65 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
60W
750 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GM206
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy