Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 960 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 112.2GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 26% (1201MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive +38%
3.405 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 960 OEM
2.46 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Nov 2015
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
1176 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
1201 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.2GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
1024
112
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.43 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.86 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.460 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.86 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
Unknown
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GM206
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
GTX 960 OEM
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy