Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 540

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 540

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 128MB VRAM Quadro FX 540 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 375W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Aug 2004
FirePro
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
250 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
-
112
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.200 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

375W
TDP
25W
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
NV43
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
NV43 GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
110 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.146 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
154 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy