Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1552 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive +1082%
3.405 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2900 GT
0.288 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Nov 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
240
112
TMUs
12
32
ROPs
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.212 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.212 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
288.5 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

375W
TDP
150W
750 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
R600
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
R600 GT (215RGFDKA13FG)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy