Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs ATI Radeon HD 4770

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs ATI Radeon HD 4770

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4770 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 4770 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive +254%
3.405 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4770
0.96 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Apr 2009
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
640
112
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
960.0 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
192.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
80W
750 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV740
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
RV740 XT (215-0727019)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.826 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
137 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy