AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

VS

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages

Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)

768 additional rendering cores

AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 's Advantages

Released 4 years late

Boost Clock has increased by 26% (1201MHz vs 950MHz)

More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)

Lower TDP (50W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

FirePro S10000 Passive +38%

3.405 TFLOPS

Radeon Pro WX 4100

2.46 TFLOPS

FirePro S10000 Passive

VS

Radeon Pro WX 4100

Graphics Card

Nov 2012

Release Date

Nov 2016

FirePro

Generation

Radeon Pro

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

825 MHz

Base Clock

1125 MHz

950 MHz

Boost Clock

1201 MHz

1250 MHz

Memory Clock

1500 MHz

Memory

3GB

Memory Size

4GB

GDDR5

Memory Type

GDDR5

384bit

Memory Bus

128bit

240.0GB/s

Bandwidth

96.00GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

-

28

Compute Units

16

1792

Shading Units

1024

112

TMUs

64

32

ROPs

16

-

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

-

16 KB (per CU)

L1 Cache

16 KB (per CU)

768 KB

L2 Cache

1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

19.22 GPixel/s

106.4 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

76.86 GTexel/s

-

FP16 (half)

2.460 TFLOPS

3.405 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

2.460 TFLOPS

851.2 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

153.7 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti

GPU Name

Baffin

Tahiti PRO GL

GPU Variant

Baffin XT

GCN 1.0

Architecture

GCN 4.0

TSMC

Foundry

GlobalFoundries

28 nm

Process Size

14 nm

4.313 billion

Transistors

3 billion

352 mm²

Die Size

123 mm²

Board Design

375W

TDP

50W

750 W

Suggested PSU

250 W

1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2

Outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

2x 8-pin

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)

DirectX

12 (12_0)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

1.2

OpenCL

2.1

1.2

Vulkan

1.2

-

CUDA

-

5.1

Shader Model

6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

1

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

2

AMD Radeon RX 6600 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

3

NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

4

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

5

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

6

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3

7

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670

8

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 OEM

9

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD Radeon HD 8450 OEM

10

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD Radeon R9 390

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD