Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD Radeon R9 390

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD Radeon R9 390

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 8GB VRAM Radeon R9 390 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Boost Clock950MHz
AMD Radeon R9 390 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (275W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive
3.405 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 390 +50%
5.12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Jun 2015
FirePro
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
512bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
40
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
2560
112
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
160.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.120 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
640.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
275W
750 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Grenada
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
Grenada PRO (215-0880030)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy