Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD Radeon R9 280X

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD Radeon R9 280X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1000MHz vs 950MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive
3.405 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X +20%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Oct 2013
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
850 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
2048
112
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
250W
750 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Tahiti
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy