Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD Radeon R9 290X

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD Radeon R9 290X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Boost Clock950MHz
AMD Radeon R9 290X 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (290W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive
3.405 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290X +65%
5.632 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Oct 2013
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
512bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
2816
112
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
176.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.632 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
704.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
290W
750 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Hawaii
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy