Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD Radeon RX 6300

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD Radeon RX 6300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 6300 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 115% (2040MHz vs 950MHz)
Lower TDP (32W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive +8%
3.405 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6300
3.133 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
32bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
768
112
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
32W
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x HDMI 2.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Navi 24
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy