Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega 56 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 55% (1471MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (409.6GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (210W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive
3.405 TFLOPS
Radeon RX Vega 56 +209%
10.54 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Aug 2017
FirePro
Generation
Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
1156 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
1471 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
384bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
409.6GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
56
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
3584
112
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
94.14 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
329.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.09 TFLOPS
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.54 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
659.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
210W
750 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Vega 10
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XL (215-0894216)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy