Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs ATI Radeon X1650 AGP

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs ATI Radeon X1650 AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Feb 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R500 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
-
112
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

375W
TDP
Unknown
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV530
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
RV530 X1650 (215CCCBKB12FG)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy