Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 vs AMD FirePro W9000

AMD FirePro S10000 vs AMD FirePro W9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 and 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 's Advantages
Boost Clock950MHz
AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (274W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000
3.405 TFLOPS
FirePro W9000 +17%
3.994 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Jun 2012
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
2048
112
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
274W
750 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Tahiti
Zaphod
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy