Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM

AMD FirePro S10000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 240 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 70.40GB/s)
1680 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (120W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 +838%
3.405 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
0.363 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Jul 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1100 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
70.40GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
1792
Shading Units
112
112
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
362.9 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

375W
TDP
120W
750 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
G92B
Zaphod
GPU Variant
G92-240-B1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy