Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S4000X vs AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition

AMD FirePro S4000X vs AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro S4000X and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S4000X 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 80W)
AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 26% (975MHz vs 775MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S4000X
0.992 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition +101%
1.997 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Nov 2014
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

725 MHz
Base Clock
850 MHz
775 MHz
Boost Clock
975 MHz
1125 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
72.00GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
1024
40
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
31.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
62.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
992.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.997 TFLOPS
62.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Venus
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Venus XT
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy