Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S7000 vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX

AMD FirePro S7000 vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S7000 and 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (125W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S7000
2.432 TFLOPS
CMP 30HX +106%
5.027 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Feb 2021
FirePro
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
22
20
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
1408
80
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
TU116
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
TU116-100-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
125W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy