CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD FirePro S7000 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
AMD FirePro S7000 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
VS
AMD FirePro S7000
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S7000 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S7000
2.432 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+393%
12 TFLOPS
FirePro S7000
VS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
Graphics Card
Aug 2012
Release Date
Feb 2024
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
22
20
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
2816
80
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Pitcairn
GPU Name
AD107
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Board Design
150W
TDP
70W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs AMD FirePro S7000
2
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 vs AMD FirePro S7000
3
AMD FirePro S7000 vs ATI Radeon HD 4250
4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs AMD FirePro S7000
5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti vs AMD FirePro S7000
6
AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP vs AMD FirePro S7000
7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs AMD FirePro S7000
8
AMD FirePro S7000 vs AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
9
AMD FirePro S7000 vs AMD Radeon HD 6870 1600SP Edition
10
AMD FirePro S7000 vs AMD Radeon RX 460
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy