Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S7150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275

AMD FirePro S7150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S7150 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 127.0GB/s)
1808 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 219W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S7150 +459%
3.768 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 275
0.674 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2016
Release Date
Jan 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1134 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
127.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
2048
Shading Units
240
128
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.72 GPixel/s
117.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.64 GTexel/s
7.537 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.768 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
673.9 GFLOPS
235.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
84.24 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
219W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
GT200B
Tonga XT GL
GPU Variant
G200-105-B3
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy