Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S7150 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition

AMD FirePro S7150 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 and 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S7150 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 3GB)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S7150 +31%
3.768 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
2.867 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2016
Release Date
Mar 2013
FirePro
Generation
Southern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
1792
128
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.60 GPixel/s
117.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.60 GTexel/s
7.537 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.768 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.867 TFLOPS
235.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
716.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
200W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Tahiti
Tonga XT GL
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy