Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S7150 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

AMD FirePro S7150 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S7150 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S7150 +201%
3.768 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 2100
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2016
Release Date
Jun 2017
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
925 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
512
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
117.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
7.537 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
3.768 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
235.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
35W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Lexa
Tonga XT GL
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
5 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy