Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S7150 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X2

AMD FirePro S7150 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S7150 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (150W vs 580W)
AMD Radeon R9 290X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (345.6GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S7150
3.768 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290X2 +49%
5.632 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2016
Release Date
Jun 2014
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
345.6GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
44
2048
Shading Units
2816
128
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
117.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
176.0 GTexel/s
7.537 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.768 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.632 TFLOPS
235.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
704.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Hawaii
Tonga XT GL
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
580W
450 W
Suggested PSU
950 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
4x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy