Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S7150 x2 vs Intel H3C XG310

AMD FirePro S7150 x2 vs Intel H3C XG310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 x2 and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S7150 x2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (265W vs 300W)
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S7150 x2 +38%
3.297 TFLOPS
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2016
Release Date
Nov 2020
FirePro Server
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
768
112
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

29.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
103.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
3.297 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
3.297 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
206.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

265W
TDP
300W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
DG1
Cloudy Tau
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
5 billion
Transistors
Unknown
366 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy