Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S7150 x2 vs AMD Radeon R7 240

AMD FirePro S7150 x2 vs AMD Radeon R7 240

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 x2 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S7150 x2 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Boost Clock780MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 265W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S7150 x2 +560%
3.297 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2016
Release Date
Oct 2013
FirePro Server
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
730 MHz
-
Boost Clock
780 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
320
112
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
103.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
3.297 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.297 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
206.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

265W
TDP
30W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Oland
Cloudy Tau
GPU Variant
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy