Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S7150 x2 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

AMD FirePro S7150 x2 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 x2 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S7150 x2 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (265W vs 375W)
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S7150 x2
3.297 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X2 +24%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2016
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro Server
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
2048
112
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
103.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
3.297 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.297 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
206.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Board Design

265W
TDP
375W
600 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
3x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Tahiti
Cloudy Tau
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy