Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S7150 x2 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

AMD FirePro S7150 x2 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 x2 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 265W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S7150 x2
3.297 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +263%
12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2016
Release Date
Feb 2024
FirePro Server
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
1792
Shading Units
2816
112
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
103.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
3.297 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
3.297 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
206.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

265W
TDP
70W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
AD107
Cloudy Tau
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
5 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy