Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9000 vs ATI FireGL V5600

AMD FirePro S9000 vs ATI FireGL V5600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro S9000 and 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9000 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
1672 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V5600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (89W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9000 +1580%
3.226 TFLOPS
FireGL V5600
0.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Aug 2007
FirePro
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1100 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
35.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
3
1792
Shading Units
120
112
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.400 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV630
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
89W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy