Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9000 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1

AMD FirePro S9000 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro S9000 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1752 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9000 +9981%
3.226 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Jan 2009
FirePro
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
40
112
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

225W
TDP
32W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV620
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
RC620 PRO
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy